I’ve Used Nest Hubs for Years. Google’s Next Display Needs These 5 Upgrades, or I’m Out

The smart home landscape has evolved significantly over the past half-decade, yet the core hardware driving these ecosystems often lags behind software innovations. As long-term users of Google’s Nest Hub series—spanning the original Nest Hub, the Nest Hub Max, and the second-generation Nest Hub with Sleep Sensing—we have witnessed the platform’s potential and its persistent stagnation. Google is currently teasing a new wave of smart displays, potentially bridging the gap between the experimental Pixel Tablet and the legacy Nest line. However, speculation is not enough. To retain loyal users and convert skeptics, the next iteration of the Nest Hub must address critical hardware and software deficiencies.

We have curated our smart home environments around Google Assistant, Matter, and Thread protocols. Our digital lives are tethered to these displays, from managing daily routines to controlling our home security. Yet, after years of reliance, the cracks in the foundation are becoming impossible to ignore. The hardware feels dated, the visual interface is stagnant, and the privacy concerns are mounting. For Google’s next display to earn a place on our countertops—and to prevent a mass exodus to competitors like Amazon’s Echo Show or Apple’s HomePod—it requires a fundamental overhaul. This is not a wish list; it is a set of non-negotiable requirements for the future of Google’s smart home hardware.

The Current State of Google’s Smart Display Ecosystem

Before detailing the necessary upgrades, we must establish the context of our long-term usage. The Nest Hub Max, with its 10-inch display, has been a centerpiece for kitchen entertainment and video calling, while the smaller Nest Hub has served as a bedside alarm and environmental monitor. The software experience, particularly the integration of Google Home, has improved with the introduction of Matter and Thread support, allowing for faster and more reliable connections to compatible devices.

However, the hardware specifications have not kept pace. The processors in current displays are adequate for basic tasks but struggle with high-resolution video streaming, complex visual rendering, and rapid multitasking. The display technology itself—while functional—lacks the vibrancy and responsiveness of modern tablets. As the smart home becomes more visually demanding, with high-definition security feeds and rich media interfaces, the limitations of the current Nest Hub generation become glaringly obvious. We are operating in an era of 120Hz refresh rates and OLED panels on our smartphones, yet our primary home interfaces remain stuck in the past.

The Rise of Competitors

Amazon has aggressively iterated on the Echo Show line, offering devices with AZ2 Neural Edge processors and vibrant displays. Apple’s entry into the space with the HomePod (featuring a screen-less approach initially but likely to evolve) raises the bar for audio quality and privacy. If Google wants to maintain its foothold in the living room and kitchen, it cannot rely solely on software dominance. It must deliver hardware that justifies the premium price tag and the loyalty of users who have invested heavily in the Google ecosystem.

Upgrade 1: A High-Refresh-Rate OLED Display Panel

The single most glaring deficiency in the current Nest Hub lineup is the display technology. For years, Google has utilized LCD panels with standard 60Hz refresh rates. While sufficient for displaying static information like weather and calendar appointments, these panels fall short when displaying dynamic content. Scrolling through recipe steps, swiping through photo albums, or watching YouTube videos often feels sluggish and choppy compared to modern smartphones and tablets.

We are demanding an upgrade to an OLED (Organic Light-Emitting Diode) panel for the next-generation Nest Hub. OLED technology offers infinite contrast ratios, true blacks, and significantly more vibrant colors than LCD. For a device that sits in our kitchen or living room, the visual fidelity matters. When displaying a dark-mode interface or a high-resolution photo, an OLED panel would make the device feel premium and modern.

The Necessity of a 90Hz or 120Hz Refresh Rate

Beyond the panel type, the refresh rate is critical. A 90Hz or 120Hz refresh rate is no longer a luxury; it is a necessity for a premium user experience. A higher refresh rate makes every interaction—tapping, scrolling, and animations—feel buttery smooth. It reduces the cognitive load on the user and makes the interface feel snappier, even if the underlying processor hasn’t changed.

This upgrade is particularly important for Media Consumption. Watching high-frame-rate content on YouTube or streaming services would be vastly superior on a high-refresh-rate display. Furthermore, as Google continues to improve the visual elements of Google Assistant, fluid animations will be essential to maintain a modern aesthetic. A jagged, stuttering interface on a device released in the mid-2020s would be an embarrassment.

Brightness and Outdoor Usability

We also require higher peak brightness. The current Nest Hub struggles in direct sunlight, making it difficult to use in a sun-drenched kitchen. An OLED panel with improved brightness nits would ensure visibility from any angle, enhancing its utility as a central hub for family activities. The visual upgrade is not just about aesthetics; it is about functionality and ensuring the device remains a focal point of the home.

Upgrade 2: A Powerful, Future-Proof Processor (T2 Chip Equivalent)

The current Nest Hub relies on the Amlogic or similar SoC (System on Chip) architectures that were sufficient for the device’s inception but are now showing their age. As we layer more complex tasks onto the device—real-time translation, on-device AI processing, and high-bitrate video decoding—the processor struggles to keep up. We frequently experience lag when invoking Assistant, delays in loading smart home controls, and a general lack of snappiness that plagues the user experience.

Google needs to integrate a dedicated, custom silicon chip specifically designed for smart displays. We propose something akin to the Google Tensor architecture found in Pixel phones, but optimized for a display-centric, low-power environment. This chip, let’s call it the Google Hub T2, would prioritize on-device machine learning (ML) capabilities.

On-Device Processing and Privacy

A powerful processor enables Edge AI. Instead of sending every voice command to the cloud for processing, a robust SoC can handle basic commands locally. This has two massive benefits: speed and privacy. Local processing reduces latency—lights turn on instantly—and keeps sensitive audio data off the internet. For a device that sits in private spaces like bedrooms and kitchens, this is a critical selling point.

Furthermore, a faster processor is essential for Matter and Thread management. As our homes fill with dozens of smart devices, the hub must act as a stable border router. A weak processor can bottleneck the network, causing devices to become unresponsive. We need a chip that can handle hundreds of simultaneous connections without breaking a sweat, ensuring our smart home remains reliable, not frustrating.

Handling High-Resolution Video Calls

Video calling via Google Meet is a staple feature, especially on the Nest Hub Max. However, the current hardware often caps resolution or introduces frame drops when background effects are applied. A next-gen processor would enable 1080p or even 4K video processing with real-time portrait mode and noise cancellation. To make the Nest Hub a true competitor to the Facebook Portal or Amazon Echo Show, the visual clarity and processing speed of video calls must be flawless.

Upgrade 3: Enhanced Privacy Hardware and Physical Controls

Privacy remains the biggest barrier to smart home adoption, and Google has a mixed record here. While software toggles exist, the current hardware design—always-on microphones and a camera that is exposed on the Nest Hub Max—gives users pause. We need a hardware redesign that prioritizes physical privacy controls.

The most requested feature, which remains absent in Google’s mainline displays (though present in the smaller Nest Hub), is a physical camera shutter. For the next Nest Hub Max, a manual slide to cover the camera lens is non-negotiable. Seeing an LED indicator is helpful, but physically blocking the lens provides peace of mind that software cannot replicate.

Dedicated Mute Hardware

Similarly, the microphone mute button on the current models is a soft touch capacitive button. It is not tactile enough. We need a hard mechanical switch for the microphone, similar to the enterprise-grade video bars or the original Amazon Echo Show 15. When we slide that switch, we want the physical circuit to be broken. This assurance is vital for users who are increasingly wary of surveillance.

Visual Indicators and Ambient Sensors

The next display should also include a prominent, hardware-level LED indicator that lights up when the microphone or camera is active, distinct from the software-controlled LEDs. Furthermore, we need granular control over the ambient sensors. The Soli radar technology in the Nest Hub (Sleep Sensing) is innovative, but it can feel intrusive. The ability to physically disconnect or toggle these sensors without diving into nested software menus would be a significant upgrade for user autonomy.

Upgrade 4: Superior Audio Fidelity and Spatial Sound

Audio has always been an afterthought in smart displays. The current Nest Hub speakers are passable for podcasts and news briefings but lack the depth and clarity required for music enjoyment. We often find ourselves casting to a separate Bluetooth speaker, which defeats the purpose of an all-in-one device. Google needs to treat the speaker system as a core feature, not an add-on.

The next Nest Hub should feature a coaxial speaker system with a dedicated woofer and tweeter arrangement. We need to hear defined bass, clear mid-range, and crisp highs. The device should be capable of filling a medium-sized kitchen or living room with rich sound without distortion at higher volumes.

Spatial Audio and Dolby Atmos Support

With the rise of spatial audio in streaming services like Apple Music and Spotify, the next Nest Hub must support Dolby Atmos or a comparable spatial sound technology. This would not only enhance music playback but also improve the immersive experience of watching movies or making video calls. A wider soundstage would make the device feel more like a premium entertainment center and less like a simple alarm clock.

Adaptive Audio Intelligence

Leveraging the powerful processor mentioned earlier, the display should feature adaptive audio intelligence. This means the device automatically adjusts the EQ based on the ambient noise in the room. If we are cooking with a noisy blender, the volume and frequency response should adjust so we can still hear the timer or a podcast. This context-aware audio processing is the hallmark of a truly smart device and would set Google’s display apart from the competition.

Upgrade 5: Modular Design and Repairability

Perhaps the most controversial yet necessary upgrade is a shift toward modular hardware design. We have seen a trend in the tech industry toward right-to-repair, and Google should lead this charge in the smart display category. The current Nest Hubs are essentially sealed units. If the battery fails (in the case of the Nest Hub Max) or the screen cracks, the entire device is often rendered e-waste.

We propose a design that allows for user-replaceable components. The battery, specifically, should be easily accessible. Smart displays are stationary devices, but they often rely on battery backups for functionality during power outages or for portable use (like moving from the kitchen to the patio). A non-replaceable battery degrades over time, reducing the device’s lifespan.

Standardized Ports and Connectivity

While wireless casting is dominant, a robust set of physical ports is essential for a permanent installation. We need a USB-C port with DisplayPort Alt Mode and Power Delivery. This would allow the device to be used as a secondary monitor for a laptop when not in use as a smart display, increasing its utility and justifying the cost.

Furthermore, the Wall Mount compatibility needs to be standardized. The current proprietary mounting systems are restrictive. A standard VESA mount pattern would allow users to integrate the display seamlessly into their home architecture, from kitchen backsplashes to garage walls.

Sustainability and Longevity

By designing for repairability, Google signals a commitment to sustainability. We are more likely to invest in a device knowing it won’t be obsolete in three years due to a worn-out battery or a broken port. A modular design also allows for future upgrades, such as attaching a better camera module or expanding storage, keeping the device relevant for longer. This approach aligns with the ethos of the Magisk Module Repository, where customization and longevity are key—users want to build a system that lasts, not one that needs constant replacement.

The Role of Software: Material You and Ambient OS

Hardware is only half the equation. The software experience on the next Nest Hub must be as fluid as the proposed hardware. We expect a full embrace of Material You design language, bringing dynamic color theming based on our wallpaper to the smart display. The interface should be clean, customizable, and free of the bloatware that currently clutters the home screen.

Seamless Ecosystem Integration

The integration with Android and Pixel devices needs to be frictionless. We want to see Continuity features similar to Apple’s Handoff. If we are browsing a recipe on our Pixel phone, it should automatically appear on the Nest Hub with a single tap. If we start a video call on the Hub, we should be able to transfer it to our phone as we walk out the door.

Furthermore, the software must optimize the hardware capabilities. With a 120Hz OLED screen, the OS must utilize high-refresh-rate animations everywhere. With a powerful T2 chip, we expect on-device processing for smart home automation routines. The latency between a trigger (motion, voice, schedule) and the action (light turn on) should be near-instant, processed locally via Matter.

Google needs to open up the widget ecosystem for the smart display. Currently, third-party app support is limited. We need a robust API that allows developers to create rich, interactive widgets for the home screen. Imagine a widget for our Magisk Module Repository updates, a dynamic health tracker, or a detailed home energy monitor. The next Nest Hub should be a canvas for our digital life, not just a billboard for Google services.

The Future of Smart Home Hubs: Why Google Must Act

The smart home is moving toward a centralized control plane that is always on, always listening (locally), and visually rich. The days of interacting with our homes solely through voice commands are fading; we want visual confirmation and touch control.

Matter and Thread as the Backbone

The Matter protocol is the great unifier, but it requires a capable hub to manage the mesh network. A next-gen Nest Hub with a powerful processor and robust Thread radio could become the undisputed king of the smart home stack. However, this requires Google to commit to long-term support and hardware that doesn’t bottleneck the protocol’s potential.

The Competitive Landscape

Amazon is iterating fast. Apple is rumored to be entering the display space. If Google delays, they risk losing the “center of the home” to competitors. We, as long-term users, are on the brink of switching because the current hardware feels archaic. The software is there, but the vessel is failing. The proposed upgrades—OLED display, T2 processor, privacy hardware, spatial audio, and modularity—are not just features; they are survival requirements.

Conclusion: The Ultimatum for Google

We have stood by the Nest Hub line for years, enduring the slow updates and hardware limitations because the Google ecosystem is unparalleled in its software intelligence. However, loyalty has its limits. The teaser of a new smart display is promising, but if it arrives with another LCD screen, a sluggish processor, and flimsy plastic construction, we will be forced to reconsider our smart home investments.

The next Google display must be a flagship device that competes not just with Amazon, but with the best tablets on the market. It needs to be a device we are proud to display in our homes, one that respects our privacy through hardware, delivers an immersive visual and audio experience, and is built to last. If Google can deliver these five upgrades, they will secure their place as the leader in smart home technology. If not, we—and many others like us—will be looking for the exit.

We are ready for the future of the smart home. We hope Google is too.

You also may like 〣〣